UPDATED 4/25/2013: Reuters Debunks Keystone XL Pipeline Myth that Tar Sands Will Be Developed Anyway

@BarackObama  stop the #Keystone  pipeline #ta...

@BarackObama stop the #Keystone pipeline #tarsands (Photo credit: ericwagner)

The Supplemental EIR that the State Department (or TransCanada’s paid contractor, rather) drafted claimed that the environmental impact of the Keystone XL Pipeline is minimal.  The reason?  Because the oil will be mined out of the ground and shipped anyway by alternatives like rail.  So why worry?  And nothing is made about the recent claim that these oil sands contain DOUBLE the carbon than all emitted in human history.  This is why Keystone means “game over” in the climate change battle.

However, Think Progress has a report out today from Reuters that says, “Oil by train may not be a substitute for Keystone pipeline.”  This debunks the State Department myth and proves that tar sands development IS in fact dependent upon Keystone.

Here’s the link:  http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/18/1886841/shocker-reuters-debunks-state-dept-claim-of-major-us-tar-sands-imports-by-rail-if-keystone-pipeline-scrapped/

I don’t need to go into all the reasons again why Keystone is good for nobody but TransCanada (see all my related posts), but this should — if Obama/Kerry/State Department are truly walking their “fighting climate change” talk — put more nails in this sickeningly unnecessary and dangerous boondoogle.

UPDATE 4/25/2013:  Even Canada’s top government Keystone advocate admitted yesterday that rail would not be an effective alternative to the pipeline.  In other words, the pipeline is necessary for tar sands development.  Without it, the carbon stays in the ground, where it belongs and maybe — just maybe — we have a shot to keep global temperatures from rising too much, too fast..  And, boo-hoo, TransCanada’s profits go down — affecting nobody in the U.S. (except for those 35 permanement jobs created).

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/25/1919011/dangers-on-a-train-top-canadian-official-disputes-state-departments-keystone-claims/

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to UPDATED 4/25/2013: Reuters Debunks Keystone XL Pipeline Myth that Tar Sands Will Be Developed Anyway

  1. Pingback: UPDATE: Prepare For the Worst – Obama Poised to Approve Keystone XL Pipeline | gettingonmysoapbox

  2. Pingback: OK, Now TransCanada Is Just Throwing it in Our Face (Keystone) | gettingonmysoapbox

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s